Car insurance up 25% for some in New Brunswick…Despite a cap on bodily injury claims that has been in place for over a decade
February 28, 2019
Based on the experience in New Brunswick, rate stabilization won’t happen in Newfoundland and Labrador if the insurance industry gets its way with a cap on bodily injury claims. Some companies in NB have increased premiums as much as 25%. This comes following claims by the Insurance Bureau of Canada that they must stabilize rates in order to make auto insurance more affordable in NL.
“The IBC has no intention, no plan, no idea how they will lower car insurance rates in NL. They simply want the Government to do what they did in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick so they can minimize the payouts they have to make to innocent accident victims. We now can see their plan didn’t work in New Brunswick as the New Brunswick Insurance Board has approved rate increases of between 13.96% and as high as 25%,” said Colin Feltham, lawyer with the Campaign. “We implore the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador not to punish accident victims with a weak promise of rate stabilization and more affordable insurance. It simply won’t happen,” continued Feltham.
We have offered solutions to the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador including things such as reduced rates for seniors, reduced rates for low kilometer drivers and drivers with a clean driving record. The RNC and the insurance industry report accidents are declining in NL. We have suggested to Government that legislating innovative enforcement options for distracted drivers can reduce accidents even more. Finally, there are better treatment protocols that the IBC claims will make victims better faster therefore reducing size of potential claims. There are ways to help people with insurance costs without taking away the rights of accident victims.
The Public Utilities Board in this province has already said that neither a Cap nor anincreased deductible will lower auto insurance rates. Now we know it won’t stabilize them either.
For more information:
New Superintendent of Insurance Report shows $92M in industry profits in NL
November 14, 2018
The automobile insurance industry in Newfoundland and Labrador reported that in 2017 $92 M more was collected in premiums from Newfoundlanders and Labradorians than was paid out in claims according to the provincial Superintendent of Insurance Report just released by Service NL. This represents an underwriting profit of over 21% and comes amid a recent review of automobile insurance by the Public Utilities Board. Despite the insurance industry claiming that it is losing money in NL, the provincial report shows a profit of approximately $56 M for third party liability insurance and another $35 M in property damage insurance and an additional $1M in profits for Accident Benefits coverage sold.
“As we have been saying for many years now, the insurance industry in NL continues to make excessive profits. They certainly want you to believe they are losing money but clearly this latest report continues to support other expert opinion that the amount of money collected in auto insurance premiums (and investment returns on those premiums) far exceeds the amount paid out,” said Valerie Hynes of the Campaign to Protect Accident Victims.
The insurance industry has been lobbying the Government to implement a cap to minimize the payout to innocent accident victims injured by reckless drivers. At the same time, the insurance industry has also said that a cap on injury claims will not lower insurance premiums.
“We find it offensive and unacceptable that the insurance industry simply wants to make even more money, not find a way to lower premiums for its customers and take away fair compensation and the rights of accident victims” continued Hynes.
We want consumers to know that, the truth is, the insurance industry is very profitable in NL and a cap or even an increased deductible will do nothing except ensure industry keeps even more of your money.
The Insult to Injury Campaign to Protect Accident Victims was launched to ensure victims of car accidents do not lose the right to access justice to obtain fair compensation when injured through no fault of their own. If the cap on compensation for victims of soft tissue injuries proposed by the insurance industry is implemented after the PUB review, it will simply mean that the insurance industry will continue to make millions in profits every year while innocent accident victims are denied fair compensation.
For more information:
Insurance Industry Investment Profit of $987 Million in Three Months Yet No Relief in Auto Insurance Premiums
October 10, 2017
The insurance industry recently reported a doubling of net investment income for property and casualty insurance in Canada. The industry publication Canadian Underwriter recently reported on research from MSA Research Inc. “Net investment income was up 101% from 490 million in Q1 2016 to $987 million in Q1 2017, MSA reported”. This profit was only in the first three months of 2017.
Insult to Injury Campaign to Protect Accident Victims is raising the importance of ensuring the auto insurance review that is pending at the PUB looks closely at the overall profitability of the insurance industry as required by its terms of reference; not just at Underwriting income (the cost paid in claims compared to premiums collected).
A profit of $987 million in just the first three months of the year would raise questions about whether insurance premiums could actually be lower if the insurance investment income was used to lower rates.
“The insurance industry will have you believe that they are losing money when you only look at the cost of claims compared to premiums collected. What these large multinational insurance companies don’t tell you, is that the auto insurance premiums paid by Newfoundlanders and Labradorians are sent out of the province to be invested,” said Insult to Injury spokesperson Brad Wicks. These Newfoundland and Labrador premiums are part of the investments that have doubled.
“Our group believes that the upcoming insurance review to be completed by the PUB should be focused on the right things. The review should look closely at the significant investment profits being made on the premiums paid by Newfoundlanders and Labradorians to mainland insurance companies and the excessive profit that allows them to earn,” continued Wicks.
The Insult to Injury Campaign to Protect Accident Victims was launched recently to ensure the victims of car accidents do not lose their right to access justice when injured. If the cap on compensation for innocent victims of soft tissue injuries proposed by the insurance industry is implemented after the PUB review, it will simply mean that the insurance industry will decide what your pain and suffering resulting from injuries sustained through no fault of your own is worth; not the Courts. That is why we have a justice system.
For more information:
709 570 8144
Campaign to Protect Accident Victims Launched in Newfoundland and Labrador
September 14, 2017
Victims of motor vehicle accidents in this province could lose their right to seek fair compensation if the provincial government agrees to a cap on compensation for pain and suffering claims that has been proposed by the insurance industry. A Campaign to Protect Accident Victims is being launched to counter this threat.
The Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), on behalf of the large national and international insurance companies it represents, has asked our government to institute a cap on compensation for pain and suffering claims, including for people who suffer life altering injuries as the result of an accident. A cap would take away a victim’s right to access justice. It also stands to increase profits for the insurance industry while at the same time taking money out of the Newfoundland and Labrador economy. This should not be the result of the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s review on auto insurance.
“Every single day we talk to people in our province who have been innocent victims of a car accident caused by distracted or impaired drivers. These are young mothers and fathers who can no longer lift their babies; men and women of all ages who cannot do their housework and sometimes their jobs and who can no longer enjoy playing sports or snowmobiling because they are in life altering pain,” said Brad Wicks, a member of the local legal community who is part of a team which has come together in a campaign to ensure the victim’s voice is heard in the upcoming review of automobile insurance. “The insurance industry does not place any value on this pain and suffering, including the mental health anguish that often follows an injury.”
The facts around this issue must not be ignored:
Total premiums charged for auto insurance have increased over time, but the portion of the premiums charged for third-party liability (the part that relates to injury claim payments) has remained relatively flat for the last decade.
- The cost of average bodily injury losses and related expenses incurred by insurance companies has been stable since 2011 and has, in fact, steadily declined since 2013.
- The number of claims is actually decreasing, consistent with recently released RNC accident statistics showing a 25% decline in motor vehicle accidents in its jurisdiction between 2013 and 2016, contrary to the insurance industry claims.
- Based on a comprehensive review of information available about the financial performance of auto insurers representing most policies sold in this province between 2011 and 2016, it has been estimated that consumers have overpaid insurance premiums by as much as $92 million dollars as these insurers have made much more during that time than what would be considered to be a fair rate of return.
“We have also seen real impacts in the Courts of how victims have the most to lose. If you have ever been a victim of a car accident, you will understand how injuries from a car accident can turn your life upside down. If you have never been a victim, you should be very concerned about the rights you may be losing,” Wicks continued.
These examples from other Atlantic provinces, where a cap has long been in place, highlight the negative impact on real people:
In the 2010 New Brunswick case of Fraser v. Haines, the Court deemed the injury of a construction worker to fail the non-minor injury test because his shoulder injury which lasted for over two years and limited his heavy physical work did not qualify as a “serious impairment.” His damages were therefore capped at $2,500. Had the cap been absent, the trial judge found that he would have awarded Mr. Fraser $30,000 for pain and suffering.
In the 2014 Nova Scotia case of Hopkins v. Graham, the Plaintiff was driving a vehicle home when the Defendant crossed the yellow line and crashed into him head-on.
At the time of the trial, Mr. Hopkins experienced “mid to upper-back pain (between the shoulder blades), shoulder pain and bilateral knee pain.” He also suffered from a “constant burning sensation across the middle of his back” that did not respond to medication and that would sometimes shoot up to his neck. All of this was aggravated by physical activity like chopping wood, or gardening, things he used to engage in habitually including his heavy physical work as a Crew Foreman with a foundation company and lobster fishing. It was more difficult for him to engage in recreational activities he previously enjoyed, like playing sports, gardening, or using his four-wheeler.
The Court found this was a minor injury and the amount awarded for aforementioned was capped at $2,500 for pain and suffering, rather than the $50,000.00 claimed.
The insurance industry is comprised of large insurance conglomerates operating from Toronto, New York, and London. It receives hundreds of millions of dollars in auto insurance premiums from Newfoundlanders and Labradorians every year. These premiums leave the Province and are invested for the benefit of these insurers’ bottom lines. Our Government should not accept their proposal to take away the right to fair compensation for the value of an innocent auto accident victim’s life altering physical and mental pain and suffering.
That is why we have a justice system.
For more information: